Do you ever think about missions and end times in the same thought?
Do you place those two things in the same category?
I will give you my answer to those questions, or rather what use to be my answer. No.
I rarely if ever thought about missions and eschatology (the study of the last times/things) together. For the longest time I treated them like two separate theological subjects with very little overlap. That is until one day I happened to come across a journal article from the 1970’s by New Testament Professor, James W. Thompson, entitled “The Gentile Mission: As an Eschatological Necessity.”
In the article Thompson addressed Mark 13.10. If you don’t recall Mark 13.10, its that point in Jesus’ Olivet speech when He says to the disciples, “And the gospel must first be proclaimed to all nations.” Now, maybe that seems to you like an obvious and simple enough verse, but I had never really grasped it before, especially its eschatological implications. I knew it was an important one for the missions community, but I never thought about its relation to the end times.
And then I started reading Thompson’s article, wherein he argued, and in my estimation argued successfully, that Mark 13.10 was an indication that the mission to the nations was just as much a prelude to the end as the other apocalyptic signs from the beginning of Mark 13.[1] As he says in his own words in the article, must indicates that for Mark and his readers, “the world mission was an eschatological necessity.”[2]
Without unpacking the entire article, argument and exegesis for you, just think about the implications of that for a moment. If, as Thompson suggests, Mark 13.10 is describing the mission to the nations as a precondition to Jesus’ return, then 1) missions should not be just another department of ministry, it should be everyone’s ministry! And 2) our thoughts about the end times should be consumed not with raptures, and anti-Christs, but with the Gospel going to the edges of the earth!
During the blip that was COVID, I preached through the book of Revelation. I can’t tell you how many people came to me during that series to talk about things like whether so and so was the beast out of the sea, or whether the new apple watch was the mark of the beast. It was endless. Of course, I don’t fault them for it. When we think about eschatology, our minds seem to naturally go there. But maybe, if Thompson is right, and I think he is, it should go somewhere else first.
Since reading Thompson’s article, I have become even more convinced by Scripture that world missions and eschatology are actually not two separate and unrelated things. Missions is eschatological in its very nature, and eschatology has to do missions. So then, if we are drawn to thinking about the end times, then let us be drawn to thinking first and foremost about (and being a part of) the mission of Christ, to bring the Gospel to places where it has not been named.
In the words of Jesus in Matthew’s gospel, “And this gospel of the kingdom will be proclaimed throughout the whole world as a testimony to all nations, and then the end will come” (Matthew 24.14).
[1] James W. Thompson, “The Gentile Mission as an Eschatological Necessity,” Restoration Quarterly 14 (1971), 23.
[2] Thompson, “The Gentile Mission as an Eschatological Necessity,” 24.